Saba Karim has done the Pataudi lectures ahead of Bachchan's name, BCCI secretary
HIGHLIGHTS
- MK Pataudi Memorial Lecture will be organized on June 12
- GM Saba Kareem extended the name of Kevin Pietersen for this.
- In the name of Pietersen, BCCI secretary has become very angry.
Former England captain and veteran batsman Kevin Pietersen has been selected for the BCCI's annual function - the MK Pataudi Memorial Lecture, but Amitabh Chaudhary, the acting secretary of the Indian Cricket Board, is very annoyed with his selection. The ceremony will be held on June 12 before the only test against Afghanistan.
Chaudhary had earlier expressed strong objection to the names of Kumar Sangakkara, Nasir Hussain, Sourav Ganguly and Kevin Pietersen, who were selected for this lecture. He was angry with the BCCI General Manager (Cricket Operations) Saba Karim to ignore old-time Indian veterans.
Chaudhary had suggested the names of Irapalli Prasanna, Abbas Ali Beg, Nari Contractor who had played with Tiger.
In an email to the acting secretary, how to taunt former Indian wicketkeeper Karim. Earlier, Karim had announced that he was "pleased to announce that Kevin Pietersen MK Pataudi has agreed to give memorier lecture."
Chaudhary has written in reference to Peterson, "On seeing the happiness of GM (cricket operation), I forced me to think that this is MK Pataudi Memorial Lecture or Sir Lane Hutton or Sir Frank Woolley Memorial Lecture in this context."
This former police official of Jharkhand has expressed displeasure that Karim did not consider his suggestions and also did not contact him on this.
He has asked five questions from Karim -
1- How did the list of four names in this regard come out on May 8 in Bengaluru without any discussion?
2- Why 75 percent of names in the list are foreign players?
3- To give lectures (not to mention Pietersen's selection) Progressiveism was not explained in detail?
4- When COA Vinod Rai had said that he was ready to consider other names, why was not he told about the unavailability of Sangakkara?
5- Based on which authority, Peterson's name was fixed, while not allowed to do so?
1- How did the list of four names in this regard come out on May 8 in Bengaluru without any discussion?
2- Why 75 percent of names in the list are foreign players?
3- To give lectures (not to mention Pietersen's selection) Progressiveism was not explained in detail?
4- When COA Vinod Rai had said that he was ready to consider other names, why was not he told about the unavailability of Sangakkara?
5- Based on which authority, Peterson's name was fixed, while not allowed to do so?
The acting secretary has accused Karim of not giving his suggestions to the CoA and he is making unilateral decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment